'Plaintiff need not apply for a
permit ...'
by Vin Suprynowicz
from http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/2001/Aug-12-Sun-2001/opinion/16707582.html
(8/2001 - Lyon County, Nevada) - Lyon
County District Court Judge Robert Estes issued a temporary
restraining order at 2:50 p.m. Aug. 7, blocking the auction of
62 head of cattle rounded up by the BLM from Ben Colvin's
range near Goldfield, 140 miles northwest of Las Vegas.
Judge Estes set a hearing in the matter
for Aug. 21.
Auctioneer Gary Snow of the Fallon
Livestock Auction then attempted to sell off a further 78
cattle belonging to Colvin's neighbor, Jack Vogt. Following an
announcement by chief state brands inspector Jim Connelley
that he couldn't guarantee clear title to the disputed cattle,
however, and in the face of loud protests from 50 ranchers
representing themselves as members of the Nevada Committee for
Full Statehood, warning "It's still stolen cattle!"
the auctioneer received no bids. The appropriated cattle
remain in their pens, dining at taxpayer expense.
The federal agents took the cattle off
Colvin's allotment in late July, contending he's in violation
of regulations pertaining to grazing permits. Colvin agrees
the land is overgrazed. But he argues the culprits aren't his
remaining handful of cows, but rather the 1,300 wild horses
and burros the BLM allows to swarm the countryside until
"It's pathetic; they're just skin and bones."
I talked to Colvin on the phone last
Sunday.
"According to them I'm permitted 980
head on my allotment, but about 1980 I took all but 500 head
off because of the wild horses and burros, and that's all we
ran through 1995.
"Then they came in with this 'Rest
& Rotation' plan. Each quarter we were supposed to move
the herd to a new quadrant, and then for an entire quarter,
March 1 through June 1, they wanted all the cattle off the
land, and I had nowhere to go with 'em.
"This is the one time of year when,
if they're going to do good, they're going to gain weight and
breed back. The other three quarters they're just in a holding
pattern or they go downhill."
In other words, to comply with the new,
revised "permit restrictions" which Colvin is now
accused of violating with his minimal 62 head, Colvin would
have had to take his cattle off the land when they're
skinniest -- at the end of the long winter -- and sell them at
garage sale prices, making no use of the land during those
very months when the spring rains make it most productive.
Then he would have to buy all new cattle in June, put them out
in the summer heat on land they had no idea how to graze, and
allow the survivors to lose weight for nine months before
selling them off again.
A ranch management plan which surely
could only be dreamed up in Washington.
Meantime, "the wild horses were to
stay year round. There's no way in the world I could run my
cattle in behind the horses; they use up all the water and
feed.
"In 1998 the BLM counted over 1,300
head of burros and horses on my allotment alone. ... I was
just overrun by horses. I could see if they kept goin' that
way some of them was gonna have to die, so I took all of my
cattle off the land but 50.
"From Oct. 15, 1971, when they
passed the Wild Horse and Burro Act to 1990, they'd only
removed 250 to 300 head." Finally, in 1997 "They
removed all they could. Before that they would turn all the
horses back out that was nine years old or older, and try to
adopt out the rest. ... Well 1997 finally was the first time
they shipped 'em all that they got in the corral, they finally
did something they should have done, more by accident than on
purpose.
"They were just skin and bones, they
were pathetic. ... Sure enough we had a real dry year, and
they had 10 or 20 times more horses on that land than they
should have. ..." Horses were dropping in their tracks
and had to be shot where they lay, Colvin recalls. "And
they say they're the ones that should be managing the
land."
Judge Loren A. Smith of the U.S. Court of
Claims in Washington City, in his March 1996 opinion in the
case of Pine Creek rancher Wayne Hage, ruled, "This court
determines that plaintiff need not apply for a permit if ...
the process is so burdensome as to deny the plaintiff's
property rights," Colvin points out.
Nor is there any requirement that he
apply for a permit to run cattle on his own adjudicated
allotment, Colvin insists. "Any of these allotments that
have been adjudicated, they're not public lands any more,
that's like a deed that you can take to the bank and borrow
against. I've been here 33 years; I bought the allotment from
Andy H. Anderson, who's still up there next to Yellowstone. I
came here the day before Thanksgiving 1968.
"I might lose those cows up in
Fallon. But I'm a firm believer once you don't sign that
permit application, they don't have any jurisdiction over
me."
Because the BLM operated with no warrant,
no court order, no due process, "To me it's still stealin'
cattle," Colvin insists. "I filled out a complaint
with both the Esmeralda and the Nye Country sheriffs. But then
politics came into play, I guess. ... The attorney general's
office came down hard and threatened the county
attorneys."
Where do Colvin and the state's few
remaining cattle ranchers go from here?
"I don't want to end up in federal
court, I'm trying different things to avoid that, because I
think once you go in there you're doomed from the start. I
didn't want to run these cows so I could spend my days in
court. ...
"I keep tellin' people if I went
down there and jumped in your car and drove it up here they'd
be on me in a flash; it's a property rights matter. But
they're above the law. I have a lot more respect for the Mafia
than I do for the BLM, because at least they know they're
crooked, and they admit they're crooked."
Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial
page editor of the Review-Journal. He is the author of
"Send in the Waco KIllers: Essays on the Freedom
Movement, 1993-1998."
|