Political
boundary proposals unveiled
BRAD SHANNON, THE OLYMPIAN OLYMPIA, WA - 9/25/01 --
Draft political maps unveiled Monday by the State Redistricting
Commission raised the possibility that many Olympia area residents
could vote next year for a U.S. representative who also represents
Bremerton.
Elsewhere in the state, at least a half-dozen state legislators --
including outspoken Democrat Hans Dunshee of Snohomish and Don Benton,
a Vancouver Republican who recently headed the state GOP -- could find
they no longer live inside their district boundaries.
Boundary changes could pit them against incumbents from neighboring
districts.
All of the proposals are in the draft stage, members of the
redistricting commission said Monday, as they unveiled the first maps
of how the state's population changes since 1990 could transform the
political landscape.
"It is indeed like putting a puzzle together," said
Democratic commissioner Bobbi Krebs-McMullen of Mount Vernon.
The proposed maps are complicated to understand or explain, and the
commission is just starting the process of creating a single plan out
of the four proposals.
What they end up with on Dec. 15 -- their legal deadline for
completing a plan -- could look very different from Monday's
proposals.
Shifting political power
"It's a real challenge to draw districts," said John
Giese, a Republican commissioner who thought the task would be easier
with modern computing technology. "There's hundreds if not
thousands of ways to draw a legal plan."
Giese said that the plans are only drafts that will change as the
commissioners meet and look for compromises.
Still, the two redistricting maps offered by Giese and the other
Republican appointee, Dick Derham, move all or part of the Olympia
area -- which now is represented by 3rd District U.S. Rep. Brian
Baird, a Vancouver area Democrat -- to the 6th Congressional District,
now held by U.S. Rep. Norm Dicks, a Democrat from Pierce County.
This would cut away part of the liberal base that has helped Baird
win two terms.
In contrast, the two Democratic plans would let Baird keep some or
all of Olympia.
Opposition surfaces
Thurston County Democratic Party chairman Dave Kempher said the GOP
plans are "ridiculous."
"They know Thurston County is a Democratic stronghold,"
Kempher said. "They want to split it up as much as possible to
make it as ineffective as possible."
Kempher said the GOP also is gunning for Baird and wants to weaken
his base.
But Derham, who proposed putting all of Olympia, Tumwater and Lacey
into the 6th District, said he's heard arguments in favor of having
the area in one district.
State Republican Party Chairman Chris Vance said the only two
options for accommodating the population growth in the 3rd District
are to either cut out more Grays Harbor voters or cut Olympia.
"Either way, the 3rd gets better," Vance said.
Vance predicted that Baird's district will be "a battleground
next year."
Baird has vowed to resist efforts to take Olympia from his turf.
Minorities complain
Other criticisms were thrown at the proposed new state legislative
boundaries.
A coalition of minority groups questioned why several of the plans
appeared to divide bastions of minority population, diluting the clout
of minority groups in the electoral process.
Of particular concern were the 11th and 37th legislative districts
in south Seattle, said James Arima, who represents the Eastside Asian
Pacific Islanders.
"They packed the 37th. The 11th was drastically changed by
most of the (plans)," Arima said. "Instead of being two good
districts where the people could feel they were represented, they made
one, and the other is all split up.''
The Democratic plan drawn by Dean Foster of Olympia appeared to
respect the minority communities of those legislative districts the
most, Arima said.
State Rep. Bill Eickmeyer, D-Belfair, groaned as he looked at how
his 35th District would lose parts of Bremerton under Democratic
plans.
The Republican plans, which add more Olympia-area voters to his
base, look better, Eickmeyer said.
Although several state legislators could find they no longer live
in their old districts, no congressmen appear to face that fate.
Overall it appeared neither party was declaring war on incumbents,
Foster said.
"I was really pleased none of us went incumbent
shopping," he said.
Public hearings next
The commission, which has met 27 times since January, plans three
public hearings, including an Oct. 1 hearing in Centralia, to get
comment on what looks right or wrong about the plans.
"It won't be very helpful to hear the same things again,"
Krebs-McMullen said. "I hope they'll look at these plans and tell
us if we've made errors or overlooked something, or that we've done a
good job.''
The commission also is making the draft maps available to the
public via the Internet.
The commission's nonvoting chairman, Graham Johnson, said he
believes the new political maps will have "a major impact on who
chooses to run for public office and who is elected."
What's next
The State Redistricting Commission unveiled draft political
boundary maps for the state's nine congressional and 49 legislative
districts Monday. Three public hearings are have been set up to
consider the plans:
- 7 p.m. Oct. 1 at Centralia College, 600 W. Locust Ave., Centralia
(in the cafeteria in the Student Services Building).
- 7 p.m. Oct. 5 at North Seattle Community College.
- 7 p.m. Oct. 9 at Spokane Falls Community College.
To view the proposed plans and other information, visit the
commission's Web site at www.redistricting.wa.gov,
or call 360-586-9000. The commission faces a Dec. 15 deadline for
submitting a plan to the Legislature, which can make only minor
changes to the plan and only then with a two-thirds majority.
If no plan is agreed to, the state Supreme Court must adopt a plan
by April 30, 2002.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any
copyrighted work in this message is distributed under
fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research
and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml] |