The bill also grants whistleblower protections for county employees who report abuses, and allows the state attorney general’s office to intervene on behalf of citizens in litigation against counties or municipalities.
Boneta, along with scores of fellow small farmers, descended on Richmond Monday to push for other measures, as well. They had mixed success.
The House Agriculture subcommittee buried Delegate Rob Bell’s HB 135, a “Virginia Farm Freedom” bill that would have freed farmers to market their goods on-site, without restrictions.
Sellers would only be required to label their products with the warning: “Not for Resale – Processed and Prepared Without State Inspection.”
Supporters denounced the current “morass of regulations” burdening small producers.
Joel Salatin, owner of Polyface Farms near Staunton, tried to blunt criticism of Bell’s bill by saying, “Innovation requires choice, and risk. We can’t be scared.”
But opponents, ranging from the Farm Bureau to the Medical Society of Virginia, lined up against the Charlottesville Republican’s measure, and it was unanimously set aside.
FULL HOUSE: Farmers and lobbyists packed a House hearing on Monday to duel over “farm freedom” legislation.
Small-farm activists, who came from all corners of the commonwealth to pack the overflowing hearing room, fared better with HB 268.
Delegate Bobby Orrock’s measure promotes “agritourism” by broadening the allowable on-site sales of farm products, essentially granting farmers the same “event” rights and privileges enjoyed by Virginia wineries.
But unlike Bell’s bill, HB 268 bars activities that create “a substantial impact on the health, safety or general welfare of the public,” empowering government officials to enforce controls on private property.
With that qualifier, Orrock, R-Thornburg, said his bill was backed by “the full width and breadth of the agriculture industry.” The panel moved it on to the House Agriculture Committee.
An identical Senate version, SB 51, has endorsements from a handful of Democrats, including Chap Petersen of Fairfax and Linda Puller of Mt. Vernon.
“This is huge. It’s not a party issue — it’s a Virginia issue,” Boneta said.
Still, some “farm freedom” activists worry they’re getting only half a loaf. They predict that counties could hem them in with restrictive local zoning ordinances and suppressive comprehensive plans.
Marshall said his HB 1219 “levels the playing field” for property owners by reversing a 1981 Virginia Supreme Court decision that gave county ordinances a presumption of constitutional validity.
The bill expressly authorizes courts to nullify local zoning ordinances that violate constitutional rights.
Marshall said precedent for his measure includes federal law (42 USC 1983 and 1988) that allows citizens to sue states and recover attorney fees for violating constitutional rights under color of state law.
Boneta said her feud with Fauquier County is “a prime example why this legislation is so vital.”
“There’s no question (Marshall’s) bill will help. We won’t have to live in fear,” she said.
“It’s heartbreaking. I could be tending my crops or aviary instead of fighting court battles. Small farmers are under unbearable pressure.”
The Virginia Association of Counties declined to comment on Marshall’s bill, saying the measure, introduced Friday, had not been reviewed by members.
WATCH VIDEO OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING
(This article was updated at 4:12 p.m.)
Kenric Ward is chief of Watchdog.org’s Virginia Bureau. Contact him at kenric@watchdogvirginia.org or at (571) 319-9824. @Kenricward