Methow Valley farmers seek funds Irrigators raising money for court battle against federal government Dan
Hansen 5/16/05 - Irrigators in Washington's Methow Valley are hoping
sympathetic people will donate to their ongoing legal battle against the
federal government.
The Washington Farm Bureau announced Wednesday that irrigators are
appealing a court decision upholding the government's decision to shut
down some irrigation ditches in recent years. Okanogan County also is
part of the appeal.
The same Farm Bureau press release seeks donations to the "Methow
Project," through the Olympia-based Washington Agricultural Legal
Foundation. The nonprofit foundation has been working on the Methow case
for three years, said Mike Poulson, executive director.
"We've had contributions from all across this state and into
Oregon and Idaho," Poulson said. "This particular issue has a
lot of implications for a whole lot of folks."
The March decision by U.S. District Court Judge Robert Whaley could
affect any irrigator whose ditches cross federal land. The Spokane judge
ruled that agencies that issue easements for ditches can place
restrictions on their use, if that's what's needed to protect endangered
species.
Some Methow Valley ditches that cross Forest Service land were shut
down for portions of the past three summers to protect salmon and
steelhead. Forest Service officials limited use of the ditches to times
when the streams from which they pull water are running high enough to
meet standards set by the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Those minimum standards range from 35 cubic feet per second on Wolf
Creek to 425 cfs on the Chewuck River, a major tributary of the Methow
River. By comparison, the Spokane River runs an average of about 6,000
cfs at the Post Falls Dam and sometimes drops below 100 cfs at the dam.
Irrigators and Okanogan County sued over the Forest Service rules,
saying the stream standards were arbitrarily set and infringe on
existing water rights. Whaley ruled that the case wasn't about water
rights, but about an agency's ability to place restrictions on an
easement.
"The district court may think this is not about water rights,
but farmers and other property owners who are facing their fourth
straight summer without water don't agree," said Galen Schuler, a
Seattle attorney working on the appeal.
Fish advocates note that the ditches -- some nearly 100 years old --
are inefficient.
Some waste several gallons of water for every one gallon delivered to
fields. In some cases, skeptical irrigators have rejected money offered
by federal agencies to improve the ditches.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml] |