Diverse recreation and government groups say Boxer/Capps Wilderness
Bill is a bad idea
OAKLEY, CA May 28, 2002 -- Diverse recreation groups and local government agencies are saying the California Wild Heritage Wilderness Act of 2002 is a bad idea. Access and resource management interests up and down the state have said the bill being carried by Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Congresswoman Lois Capps (D-CA) will negatively affect recreation access and prohibit wildfire management. Recreation groups who have stated opposition or voiced concern about the plan include; the Backcountry Horsemen of California, the California Equestrian Trails and Lands Coalition, the BlueRibbon Coalition, the Bicyclists of Nevada County, the Warrior's Society and Southern Sierra Fat Tire Association mountain bike clubs, the American Motorcyclists Association, the California Off-Road Vehicle Association, the California Association of Four-Wheel Drive Clubs, and the SAMS Coalition. Various county governments have expressed concerns about the proposals and have passed resolutions against the Act or have stated significant issues remain unresolved including; Tulare County, El Dorado County, Madera County, Inyo County, Alpine County and Tehama County. In addition, some water districts have expressed concerns the Act's designations would affect their operations for repairs and safety checks. The Los Padres National Forest also appears to have reservations, having noted in a recent review of the Boxer/Capps Plan, "Expanded Wilderness designation would displace motorized and mechanized recreation into the remaining acres of the National Forest... additional Wilderness designation restricts the ability to relocate needed recreation capacity (e.g. trails and campgrounds) to more appropriate sites in the forest." The review also stated, "Wilderness designation would preclude the use of mechanized equipment (such as chainsaws) in trail maintenance. The miles of trails maintained would be reduced and the cost per mile would be increased. The net result would be a loss of available trail miles due to closure by vegetation growth." Don Amador, the western representative for BlueRibbon, said, "This bill will close many of our favorite roads and trails that outdoor recreationists have cared for and maintained for 20 years. I think it is unfair for us to be 'rewarded' for our stewardship and volunteer efforts with a closed sign." "We believe that protection of lands and access are not mutually exclusive but are, in fact, necessary for the health and vitality of our forests. A growing number of families want to enjoy the great outdoors and that is why BlueRibbon is offering its 'Backcountry proposal' as an alternative to federally designated Wilderness," Amador said. "Rather than a new generation of broken promises, we feel this is a time for new ideas to resolve the Wilderness debate," Amador concludes. Chris Vargas, the executive director of planning for the Warrior's Society Mountain Bike Club, said, "We are concerned that the Wilderness designation has been abused by the so-called environmental movement to the point where it will have a detrimental affect on not only our personal freedom, but our economic and national security as well." "It is the club's policy to oppose all new Wilderness designations until an alternative designation, such as the Backcountry plan, is adopted and implemented," Vargas states. # # # The BlueRibbon Coalition is a national non-profit recreation group that champions responsible use of public lands. It represents over 1,100 organizations and businesses with approximately 600,000 members.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml] |