COMMUNITY PLANS = SUSTAINABLE SCAMS

SUMMARY: Joanne Nathan offers a peek behind the scenes of some Community
Plans in Santa Cruz County, California, exposing their real purpose - to
take away personal choice and usher in a new form of governance. Analysis
and commentary from Freedom 21 Santa Cruz
(http://www.freedom21santacruz.net/)

FULL TEXT:

Commentary by Joanne Nathan, Freedom 21 Santa Cruz
(http://www.freedom21santacruz.net/)

[FREEDOM, CA - 12/15/03] -- Most of us would appreciate living in
affordable, well-designed communities with safe and beautiful places to ride
bicycles, to jog, to walk, to shop, to play, to dine and to work. However,
many community plans that promise to deliver these things actually have two
purposes. One is the ostensible purpose of making a community plan
acceptable to people and the other - the real purpose - is designed to take
away personal choice and usher in a new form of governance.

Community Plans are about creating Sustainable Communities. At first blush,
the words sound good, but the ideas behind them are not. Sustainable
Communities [L1] are based on a new set of values where, for example, nature
takes precedence over man and where non-elected council members decide what
we can and cannot do.

ARE COMMUNITY PLANS REALLY A PRODUCT OF THE COMMUNITY?

Current Santa Cruz County 2nd District Supervisor Ellen Pirie claims that
plans in her district - The Seacliff Village Plan, the Corralitos Valley
Community Plan and the Aptos Village Plan - are derived from each community
[1]. But this is not true. All three plans receive support from
organizations outside their respective communities and are fueled by the
Santa Cruz County Planning Department and other government agencies
[2][3][4].

Some neighborhood residents are recruited to join newly forming planning
committees, and there may be valid issues that need to be addressed, but
selective community presence in name and/or participation is designed to
garner the appearance of broad community support for a plan that has been
predetermined [5] - and not fully revealed.

The plans that neighborhoods actually end up with are not local and they are
not popularly driven. All of the plans in Supervisor Pirie's district have a
predetermined outcome and follow guidelines similar to those presented in
"The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide - An Introduction to Sustainable
Development Planning" [L2] put out by the International Council for Local
Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) [6]. ICLEI is a non-governmental
organization (NGO) based in Toronto, Canada [7].

Agenda 21 is a world-wide blueprint for implementing Sustainable Development
[L3] that is designed to control everything we do, from the cradle to the
grave and the bedroom to the boardroom [8].

The foundational infrastructure for Sustainable Communities is created by
implementing Smart Growth. Smart Growth policies are characterized by the
development of rails, trails and high-density real estate, accomplished by
central planners in coalition with select businesses. Under these policies,
private automobile use is discouraged (taking away our freedom of mobility),
residents are crammed into dense living and working conditions, and control
of public utilities and natural resources is consolidated in a central
authority.

The Santa Cruz County Planning Department has been implementing Smart Growth
and Sustainable Development objectives through directives from Santa Cruz
County Measure C - "Decade of the Environment". Measure C was endorsed by
the Supervisors in 1990 and again in November 2000 under a new name:
"Environmental Principles and Policies to Guide County Government" [9] .

A look into Agenda 21 and Measure C explains the reason for Highway 1
traffic congestion and the phenomenon of shrinking roads and insufficient
parking spaces. Santa Cruz Measure C matches Agenda 21 ICLEI guidelines to
create disincentives for us to drive our cars. Recommendations to eliminate
personal automobile usage in exchange for mass transit are always active
ingredients to Sustainable Community Campaigns.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE CORRALITOS VALLEY COMMUNITY PLAN

The Draft Corralitos Valley Community Plan (dated February 2000) explains
that the development of an area plan was addressed on September 6, 1990,
during a Town Hall meeting with former 2nd District County Supervisor Robley
Levy. People in the Corralitos community had gathered to discuss the
county's purchase of land for a park, allocation of grant money for water
quality programs and development of a Town Plan [10].

"Following the September Town Hall Meeting," the draft plan states, "the
Corralitos Community received assistance from the County's Planning
Department to develop a "Valley Plan" for the Corralitos area... The county
allocated $12,500 from the General Plan Update budget and arranged for the
City and Regional Planning School of California State University (Cal Poly)
to assist in the planning efforts for the Corralitos community" [11].

By 1997 the "Planning Team" included partnerships between the County of
Santa Cruz Planning Department, the City of Watsonville, the Corralitos
Valley Community Council (CVCC) and other groups, agencies, organizations
and interested community members [12].

The current Chairman of the Corralitos Valley Community Plan, Daniel
Mountjoy [13], holds a PhD in Human and Community Development from the
University of California at Davis [L4]. He works as an employee of the
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in a division called the
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The USDA[L5] [14] and NRCS
[L6] work diligently with other federal, state, and local government and
non-government organizations (NGOs) to develop Sustainable Rural Communities
that are also in step with the Agenda 21 ICLEI Planning Guidelines.

PLANS CLAIM TO GUIDE, PROTECT, AND ENHANCE THE COMMUNITY

Some people believe that neighborhood "plans" will help "guide", "preserve"
and "enhance" their community.

Nothing could be further from the truth. In reality, the words "guide",
"preserve" and "enhance"? should be substituted with "control" [15].

CONTROL WITH A CARROT AND A STICK

ICLEI, the International Council, explains that since local government will
never be in a position to monitor and guide the millions of daily actions of
local residents, "positive and negative feedback" is a valuable tool in the
development of Sustainable Communities. The establishment of clear
incentives and rewards for approved behaviors and clear disincentives for
what they deem to be undesirable behaviors is part of a strategic "Action"
plan. Incentives can include rewards ranging from public recognition to
financial rewards or rebates. Disincentives can range from simple
notification of problems to the imposition of fines and regulations [16].

ICLEI stands for policies that are anti-constitutional and anti-human. It is
no surprise that we have seen increasing regulations and arbitrary
code-enforcement policies adversely affecting mountain and rural residents.
Many have been driven out of their homes and forced to sacrifice their
livelihoods. Agenda 21 plans include policies that make it hard for rural
residents to protect themselves against fire, while simultaneously rejecting
solutions to create viable water supplies [17].

WHY IS THIS HAPPENING?

The true objective behind Sustainable Communities and larger regional plans
[L7] is to restructure government by taking clearly defined political
boundaries represented by elected officials and incorporating them into
larger intra-regional councils that are run by non-elected and unaccountable
bureaucracy [18][19]. This creates the opportunity for the formation of new
councils, committees, associations, organizations, agencies, etc., that
typically report to higher apex councils. This is the same governmental
operating system used in the twentieth century Russia, Italy, Germany and
throughout the soviet bloc. The purpose of such a defacto governing system
is to "partner" government with business and gain control over the
production and distribution of all resources.

DON'T BE FOOLED

Community Plans shift the answer of "Who decides?" from you to a coordinated
but often unknown system of councils that partner with government
enforcement agencies. The goal is to modify individual behavior so that
people become molded into compliance to the dictates imposed by the
minority-rule of elitists.

These dishonest plans have flourished in Santa Cruz County under the watch
of the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors. They arranged for these
plans - they misled the public about these plans - and now they should make
these plans go away! Now is the time for the current Board of Supervisors to
abandon its destructive course and begin to administer government within
constitutional boundaries.

Now is the time for all good people to start understanding the internal
workings and ultimate implications of Sustainable Development/Agenda 21.
Don't be confused by Agenda 21's "warm and fuzzy" programs including:
Community Plans, Smart Growth and Sustainable Communities [20].

NOTES:

[1] Supervisor Ellen Pirie at the Corralitos Town Hall Meeting, Corralitos
Women?s Club, August 28, 2003.

[2] DRAFT Corralitos Valley Community Plan, County of Santa Cruz, February
2000 p. I-4.

[3] Seacliff Village Plan Committee Brochure Supporter List [L8]

(Retired Senator Henry Mello, Supervisor Ellen Pirie, Robert Switzer of
Trade and Commerce Agency, Santa Cruz Environmental Council, Save our
Shores, Santa Cruz Community Foundation, etc.)

[4] Aptos Village Plan Meeting June 7, 2003 Supervisor Ellen Pirie and the
County Planning Department sponsored a facilitated meeting with $10,000 paid
to the consulting firm of Moore, Iacofano and Goltsman (MIG) [L9].

[5] Pirie, Ellen, "What is Smart Growth?", Mid County Post December 3-16,
2002.

[6] ICLEI's Local Agenda 21 Campaign [L10].

[7] The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide: An Introduction to Sustainable
Development Planning, Published by International Council for Environmental
Initiatives (ICLEI) Toronto, ON, Canada and The International Development
Research Center (IDRC), Ottawa, ON, Canada and The United Nations
Environment Programme [L11] (UNEP)Nairobi, Kenya, 1996.

[8] Joan Peros, Geopolitical Journalist, United Nations Conferences.

[9] Mauriello, Susan (County Administrative Officer), Letter to Santa Cruz
County Board of Supervisors submitting "2001-2002 Annual Environmental
Progress Report for adherence to Measure C programs", May 28, 2002.

[10] DRAFT Corralitos Valley Community Plan, County of Santa Cruz, February
2000 p. I-4.

[11] Ibid., p. I-4.

[12] Ibid., p. I-5.

[13] Revised Draft Corralitos Valley Community Plan, County of Santa Cruz,
May 03, 2002.

[14] cf.
http://www.usda.gov/agency/oce/oce/sustainable-development/secmemo.htm

[15] Smithson, Julie Kay, Acronym Glossary, Property Rights Research [L12],
2001.

[16] The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide: An Introduction to Sustainable
Development Planning, Section 6.4: "Community Feedback".

[17] What UNEP considers to be Unsustainable[L13] - Agenda 21 and Global
Biodiversity Assessment Report.

[18] cf. Revised Draft Corralitos Valley Community, May 2002 pp.5-6. for
example: "[The core planning area] covers the entire 27 sq. mile area of the
Corralitos-Browns Creek watersheds."

[19] Monmonier, Mark, How to Lie with Maps, University of Chicago Press,
Chicago, 2nd ed., 1996. (Available for purchase through the American
Planning Association)

[20] Lively, Don, "Do we need another entity telling us how, where to live?"
[L14], Contra Costa Times, October 22, 2003.

REFERENCED LINKS

[L1]
http://www.freedom21santacruz.net/advance/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

[L2] http://krushinator.iclei.org/merchant/merchant4.cfm?pid=8&cid=6

[L3] http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/index.htm

[L4] http://ice.ucdavis.edu/

[L5] http://www.usda.gov/sustainable/#Policy

[L6] http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/partners/

[L7] http://www.calregions.org/

[L8] http://members.cruzio.com/~seacliff/

[L9] http://www.migcom.com/home/index.html

[L10] http://www.iclei.org/ICLEI/la21.htm

[L11] http://www.unep.org/

[L12] http://www.propertyrightsresearch.org/

[L13]
http://www.freedom21santacruz.net/advance/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=7

[L14]
http://www.freedom21santacruz.net/advance/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=50

ABOUT FREEDOM 21 SANTA CRUZ

Freedom 21 Santa Cruz is a freedom policy center that celebrates the
principles of self governance and individual liberty which inspired the
Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of
America. We are individuals who advance the freedom of all by promoting and
strengthening the practice of Constitutional administration in local, state,
and national government. Participation in Freedom 21 Santa Cruz is open to
the public. Participants include people from all political parties who are
united in the pursuit of individual liberty and the protection of our US
Constitutional Republic.

(c) 2004 Freedom 21 Santa Cruz. Permission to redistribute or republish
granted on condition that you email intent to:
madison@freedom21santacruz.net. For more information or to make a
contribution, please visit http://www.freedom21santacruz.net/.