United Nations Attack on Gun
Ownership
By Phyllis Schlafly
from
eco-logic
The
attempt this year to reprise last year's Million Mom
March was a dud, attracting only about 200
demonstrators, and the Democrats' political gurus are
whining about how Al Gore's pro-gun-control stance cost
him votes last year in crucial states. So the anti-gun
activists have moved to a less democratic venue: the
United Nations.
On July 9 to 20, New York City will host the
United Nations Conference on Illicit Trade in Small Arms
and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects. The purpose of
this conference is to demonize the private ownership of
guns and get governments to confiscate all privately
owned guns.
Don't be misled by the term "small arms."
UN documents define small arms as weapons "designed
for personal use" (such as your Browning pistol,
your Ruger rifle, or your Winchester shotgun), while
light weapons are for use by several persons as a crew.
Don't be misled by the term "illicit"
trade. UN documents make it clear that, since most
illegal guns start out as legal purchases, illicit trade
must be stopped by clamping down on legal gun owners.
Don't think that this UN conference is just a
talkfest. It is scheduled to produce a legally binding
treaty to require governments to mark, number, register,
record, license, confiscate and destroy all guns except
those in the hands of the military and the police.
Indeed, the first day of the conference is to be
called "Small Arms Destruction Day." The
conference's Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) is calling
on all governments, with the assistance of the UN's NGOs
(Non-Government Organizations) and "civil
society" (a fancy name for the NGOs working in
tandem), to organize public events to promote the
destruction of small arms and light weapons on that day.
The decision on NGO participation, adopted by the
Prep Com without a vote, is in line with the growing UN
practice of expanding the influence of
"relevant" NGOs while bypassing sovereign
member states. "Relevant " means only those
NGOs that promote the UN agenda.
The 18-page Draft Program of Action to be presented
to the July conference sets forth the rationale plus the
mechanisms for eliminating the "wide
availability" of guns. It's obvious that the United
States is the target because we are the only country
with a Second Amendment, and other democracies such as
England, Canada and Australia have either banned or
severely restricted private gun ownership.
The Draft Program wraps its gun-confiscation message
in typical UN semantics, but makes little attempt to
conceal the mailed fist in the velvet glove. It states:
"In order to promote peace, security, stability and
sustainable development in the world, we commit
ourselves to addressing this problem in a comprehensive,
integrated, sustainable, efficient and urgent
manner."
Indeed, the plan is comprehensive and integrated.
According to the Draft Program, "Preventing and
reducing the illicit trade in small arms and light
weapons consists of two sets of measures: the national
control of manufacture and the proper marking of small
arms and light weapons, coupled with accurate, sustained
record-keeping and exchanges of information."
Government "marking" and record-keeping is
"an integral part" of the process. It's clear
that the UN is demanding that governments build a
national electronic database of all guns and their
owners, and then facilitate "an information
exchange" (i.e., share the database with the UN).
Through the Department for Disarmament Affairs, the
UN promises to "develop an international mechanism
that will facilitate the exchange of information on all
aspects" of guns, i.e., a global gun registry.
To wipe out private gun ownership, the UN demands
that all governments enforce "adequate laws,
regulations and administrative procedures to exercise
effective control over the legal manufacture and
possession of small arms and light weapons." And
the UN demands that governments criminally prosecute all
those who don't comply.
The UN plans to develop "model national
legislation" so that Congress will pass laws that
conform to the treaty's requirements. The UN plans to
guide Congress by publishing "best practices"
for legislation and procedures.
All unmarked or inadequately marked small arms and
light weapons are to be confiscated and
"expeditiously destroyed." The government is
to assure that "no re-transfer of small arms and
light weapons takes place without prior
authorization" by the government because the UN
disapproves of the possession of guns by civilians who
are "not part of responsible military and police
forces."
The UN also has a plan to propagandize Americans to
accept this global ban on private gun ownership. The
Draft Program calls for "seminars, conferences,
consultations and workshops conducted by the United
Nations " for the purpose of "promoting the
action plan."
As part of its "awareness-training" to
induce Americans to accept the new ban-the-guns policy,
the UN wants government to pledge to destroy guns in
"public destruction events."
When the United Nations bounced us from the Human
Rights Commission, while giving seats to Sudan, Libya,
China and Cuba, that was just an insult. But it's deadly
serious business when the UN tries to take away our
guns.
Phyllis Schlafly is President of Eagle
Forum, and will be a speaker at the Freedom
21 Conference in St. Louis, July 12-14.
Editor's note: This action by
the United Nations was foretold in the report of the
Commission on Global Governance, Our
Global Neighborhood. You may wish to read an
analysis of this report by clicking here.
|