Yank
your kids out of school
Posted: July 13, 2002 1:00 a.m. Eastern By
Joel Miller
Let me ask you a question. Which is worse: The drugs your
children might pick up in public school, or the ideas? It's a
serious question, asked mainly because parents seem inordinately
fearful of substances and much less so about thoughts. But
thoughts can be dangerous things.
"The mischief done by bad ideologies, surely, is much more
pernicious, both for the individual and for the whole society,
than that done by narcotic drugs," said Ludwig von Mises.
It's not far-fetched. Really, which was worse: Crack or Marxism?
Schools exist to dispense thoughts, to train the minds of
children and provide them with the information and theoretical
wherewithal to make sense out of the world. If that sounds like
too lofty a job description, certainly some public school teachers
would say I was actually downplaying their importance.
In his book, "My Pedagogic Creed," education theorist
John Dewey went so far as to say, "The teacher always is the
prophet of the true God and the usherer in of the true kingdom of
God."
Lofty indeed. Sounds like Muhammad with a chalkboard.
Dewey said also, "The teacher is engaged, not simply in
the training of individuals, but in the formation of the proper
social life." Make sure you stumble a bit on
"proper." Trip over it again if you need the import of
that little word to really sink in: "formation of the proper
social life."
What is proper is, of course, something humans have only
been debating about since the Fall. The reason we have
disagreements on religion, philosophy, policy and whether it's OK
to wear Bermuda shorts to church boils down simply to the fact
that what is proper – socially, ideologically, etc. – is not
an easily decided thing.
If you're a Christian, you have the Bible, which – despite
the fact that Christians have a hard time agreeing on what it says
(handcuff an Arminian and a Calvinist together for a week if you
doubt me) – provides a common foundation from which to work. In
that broad commonality, most disagreements can be reconciled.
But handcuff a Christian together with – take your pick – a
Hindu, a naturalist, an atheist, a Buddhist, a New Age
spiritualist, a Wiccan, a Mormon, a Muslim or Miss Cleo, and many
disagreements will be completely irreconcilable because the
various belief systems contain presuppositions that are mutually
contradictory.
Each of those systems will interpret facts based on their
respective presuppositions. The naturalist, for instance, will not
look at science the same way a Hindu will, or a Christian. He
presumes nothing exists beyond the material world. The Hindu and
the Christian disagree with him emphatically.
So how does that play in school?
The science teacher will likely be a good naturalist. He'll
thus discount the notion of intelligent design or creation because
that presupposes something outside nature. We can't have that, so,
evolution becomes the ruling theory.
Of course, that also leaks out into other fields as well –
say, any discussion about the environment, something rife
in public schools. Ecology and environmental policy hinge on
one's worldview as much as a belief in God – especially if you
believe God made the environment. Even someone basically
anti-religious can object. Economist Steven E. Landsburg has
written about his objection to his daughter being schooled in
"environmentalism," which he slams as "increasingly
like an intrusive state religion."
By its nature, a worldview is pervasive. It informs and answers
questions of ethics and morality, economics and politics, arts and
culture. Every sphere of life is affected by an individual's
philosophy.
Yet, strangely, parents seem out of the loop when it comes to
what their children learn in school, how they learn it and at the
expense of what they might have learned otherwise. Many parents,
of course, do care a great deal. But for those that do not, stop
and think about some things:
Does the worldview of your children's teachers jibe with yours?
How does that affect what your child is learning? Balanced with
whatever instruction she gets at home, who is having the bigger
impact? Do you want a naturalist telling your child what is proper?
Landsburg might, but what about someone who's Jewish or Muslim?
As James Dobson has been pointing
out recently, public schools across the nation are pushing
curriculum increasingly supportive of homosexuality,
postmodernism, secularism and … take your pick of anything
pooh-poohed by Holy Writ.
Dobson's solution? "In the state of California and places
that have moved in the direction that they've gone with the
schools, if I had a child there, I wouldn't put that youngster in
the public schools," he said in his March 28 "Focus on
the Family" broadcast.
Earlier this week, he not only reiterated that notion but went
further, basically recommending that Christian teachers bail out
of public schools as well. This idea is, of course, not new. It
sparked the private-school renaissance of the '70s and '80s and
fuels the growing home-schooling movement today. No, not a new
idea, but a great idea.
At bottom, the issue isn't about what philosophy you as a
parent hold, but how much you care about what philosophy your
child is getting force-fed at school.
If you are concerned about what drugs your child may be putting
into his body, be triply concerned with what is going into his
mind and yank him out of public school.
Related columns:
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]
|