Hatchery fish must be
figured in with "wild" fish for endangered species;
draft plan by NMFS may affect fish debate
WASHINGTON FARM BUREAU
NEWSWATCH
July 25, 2002
No. 84
THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE HAS RELEASED A DRAFT
POLICY regarding the role of hatchery fish in listing Pacific
salmon and steelhead for protection under the Endangered Species
Act. The policy was prompted by a federal court decision that
NMFS could not list naturally spawning salmon without extending
federal protection to hatchery fish in the same Evolutionarily
Significant Unit. NMFS said the draft, which it described as a
"pre-decisional document" was designed to ensure that
hatchery populations would be considered both for their positive
and negative effects on wild salmon in determining which ESUs to
list for protection. NMFS admitted that under its current
policy, only the negative effects were considered. In a letter
to tribes and other "co-managers" of salmon, NMFS
Northwest Regional Director Bob Lohn said, "If an ESU as a
whole warrants listing, all populations in an ESU will be listed
whether they are of natural or hatchery origin..." But risk
of extinction will still be based on whether an ESU "is
sustaining itself through natural reproduction in its natural
ecosystem over the long term." NMFS also said that the ESA
considers artificial propagation a legitimate method of
conservation.
THE SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER INTERPRETED THE DRAFT POLICY TO
MEAN that NMFS can't end ESA protections for salmon simply
because hatcheries can pump out millions of fish from the same
ESU. The P-I reported the draft disappointed property-rights
advocates and cheered environmentalists. The newspaper also
noted the draft comes "even as Washington officials are
allowing unusually generous salmon-fishing limits," and for
the first time, "anticipates using some hatcheries to help
rebuild dwindling wild stocks." An Associated Press article
led with the policy giving "hatchery salmon endangered-fish
status" along with identical wild populations. "It's
an all-or-nothing determination," NMFS spokesman Brian
Gorman said. The AP said the proposal "drew criticism from
groups on all sides of the hatchery-fish debate," but was
praised by fishing groups. Still, the AP noted, lumping hatchery
and wild salmon for protection under the ESA could place greater
restrictions on harvest. The draft was being sent to four state
wildlife agencies, 52 Indian tribes, and two other U.S. agencies
for comment. It will be released for public comment after the
"co-manager" review. The draft policy is available at:
www.nwr.noaa.gov/HatcheryListingPolicy/HatcheryListingPolicy.html
<http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/HatcheryListingPolicy/HatcheryListingPolicy.html>.
A SEATTLE LAW FIRM PLANNED TODAY TO FILE SUIT IN AN IDAHO STATE
COURT to stop Kentucky bluegrass growers from burning field
stubble. (Spokesman-Review, July 25) "These people are
relentless," said Linda Clovis, a spokesman for the North
Idaho Farmers Association. "It's to the point where you
can't farm anymore. You have to spend half your time fighting
all these battles." Last week, U.S. District Judge Edward
Lodge dismissed a suit that argued field burning violated the
Clean Air Act. The class-action suit to be filed today by
attorney Steve Berman argues that field burning violates Idaho's
trespass and public nuisance laws. It asks for an injunction
against burning, or a temporary 14-day restraining order.
Washington has already banned field-stubble burning by grass
growers.
THE WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL IS THREATENING TO SUE THE
Peshastin Irrigation District if it refuses to negotiate with
the group over ways to protect salmon and bull trout in
Peshastin Creek. (Wenatchee World, July 24) A spokesman for the
district said the environmental group is demanding that more
water be left in the creek than Mother Nature provides, even if
the district was shut down. The district's 14-mile canal serves
nearly 800 farmers and residential landowners. Chelan County
already plans to install a fish ladder at the district's
diversion point.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any
copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair
use without profit or payment for non-profit research and
educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]
|