Lawmakers
modifying old primary Major parties critical of lawmakers' attempt to retain elements of open voting system David Ammons - Associated Press Jan. 31, 2001 - OLYMPIA, WA _ Washington's major political party leaders on Tuesday rebuffed legislative efforts to retain key features of the state's popular "blanket" primary, but lawmakers said they won't back down. Newly elected Republican Chairman Chris Vance, traveling to the Capitol on his first full day on the job, joined Democrats and Libertarians in demanding the right to restrict voters to one party's nominating ballot -- and to have at least voluntary registration by party. Libertarian Party attorney John Mills of Tacoma urged lawmakers to cooperate with the parties in crafting a new primary system, calling the situation "the Cuban missile crisis of Washington politics." If the Legislature plays hardball, the issue will be settled by the federal courts, he said. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled last summer that states cannot coerce political parties to choose their nominees through a "blanket" primary that allows all voters to take part. Washington has had such a system since 1935. The high court's decision came in a California case, leading Rep. Jeff Morris, D-Mount Vernon, to complain Tuesday, "It's ironic that California has messed up both our electricity and our elections." A large majority of legislators oppose changes in the state's 66-year-old primary that allows crossover voting and that allows voters to keep their party preferences private. Key lawmakers in both houses are trying to preserve as much of the blanket primary as they can persuade the parties to accept. The bipartisan House Select Committee on Elections has developed a bill that would allow voters to keep their party affiliation private and continue being able to vote for any candidate for any office. The proposal would permit voluntary party registration and would give the political parties a much stronger role in determining their candidates. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml] |