Parker
Stoops talks about how to gather public information
Howdy!
My
name is Parker Stoops, and I am a two-bit citizen activist in a tiny
village no one has ever heard of in a rural county that spans the far
upper left corner of Washington state. Bob and Sue Forde are my friends,
and somehow they have gotten this idea in their heads that I’m doing
something interesting, and you’d like to hear about it. When Sue asked
me
to compile a brief summary of my activities regarding public disclosure,
like a crazy fool I said, "Okay, on the condition I can start with a
disclaimer." Here it is:
If you are an official, agent, or other minion of some
government
agency, don’t read this. Turn around now, while you can still save
your
blood pressure, ‘cause this ain’t goin’ where you’re goin’, and
you’re
gonna hate it when we get there.
If
you are an extreme environmentalist, or a subspecies of liberal who
wants the coercive power of government to force your values on the common
folk, GIT!! Get thee behind me. You and I hate each other already,
there’s no chance of us ever getting along, and reading this is just
gonna make you mad. There’s nothing here for you.
If
you are a pessimist who thinks that government is so big and solid
that no ordinary person could ever budge it, you may read this for
entertainment purposes, but in the long run it’ll be a waste of your
time.
However
- if you believe in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, if
you value freedom for yourself and your children, if you think that
citizens can and should make their own decisions about guns, private
property, and taxes, while respecting the rights of others, then you’re
my kind of people. Come on, let’s kick some butt!
I’m
nobody special, just an average Joe who refuses to be intimidated by
bureaucrats. I’ve felt the frustration of seeing agencies enact and
enforce unfair laws, and then add insult to injury by breaking the law
themselves when it suits their purposes. That is wrong. Public officials
are sworn to uphold the law, but instead many of them have made a career
out of using the laws to impress their own twisted values upon society.
Unfortunately,
many people feel helpless when some arrogant functionary
tells them, "You can’t subdivide your land" or "You have
to plant a
300-foot buffer zone." Sometimes they give up. Sometimes they tell
all
their neighbors, and then give up. Sometimes they scrape together enough
money to hire an attorney who bleeds them dry, and then they give up.
I’m
here to tell you, you don’t have to give up. A citizen can’t do
everything, but he can do a lot more than most people think.
Tip
#1: Next time a county employee tells you a regulation, ask them for
the specific statute, c
ode, or policy where the rule in question may
be
found, and when it was enacted into law. Ask them to give you a copy of
it, or put their decision in writing.
It
takes work, sometimes hard work. Maybe it means going to a meeting
and testifying when you’d rather see a movie. I’ve spent some evenings
studying a particular code or ordinance when I deserved to be reading a
western novel instead. But if we believe that public servants should work
for the public, we need to make them toe the line. We cannot afford the
luxury of letting them go on unchallenged.
One
essential aspect of accountability is that the citizens must be able
to find out what their government is doing. Without this element,
ordinary people are at a severe disadvantage when dealing with a
governing body that lies, denies, and confuses the issue. That is why I
hope you will agree with me that public disclosure is a vital issue, and
one that is not always used to its fullest extent by citizens.
One
tool at our disposal is RCW 42.17, the Washington Public Disclosure
Act. Passed as Initiative 276 in the early 70’s, it defines the
operating, archival, and administrative documents of any entity partially
or entirely funded by the state or its political subdivisions as public
records, and requires agencies to present them to
citizens upon request.
This law is biased in favor of the citizen, if he
knows how to use it.
Apparently
the authors realized that an individual is often intimidated
when he faces the monolithic power of a government
agency, and they
framed the Act in such a way as to level the
playing field somewhat. Of
course, agency personnel will deny this, because
they want to discourage
you from exercising your rights, but if you know
the law and they do not,
you’ll have the opportunity to enlighten them.
Tip
#2: Contact the Public Disclosure Commission at 1-877-601-2828 and
request a copy of RCW 42.17, the Washington Public
Disclosure Act. This
is also on their website at www.pdc.wa.gov
and while you’re there,
download the WAC-390 files which are the
administrative rules about the
public disclosure process. Then, contact the
Attorney General’s office at
1-800-551-4636 and request a copy of their
pamphlet, Obtaining Public
Records. Also, visit their website at www.wa.gov/
and while you're there, go and download the
Open Meetings and Records Deskbook, which contains
many explanations and
case law studies of public disclosure
topics.
Some
records are exempt from disclosure. For example, the Sheriff’s
Department is not required to release information
about a criminal
investigation in progress (however, when an arrest
is made and charges
are filed, that becomes public record, and the
judicial hearings are
"public meetings" that citizens can
attend). For the most part, the
courts have ruled that where agency actions are
concerned, disclosure is
the rule and the exemptions should be narrowly
applied, and only in cases
where absolutely necessary to protect the innocent,
etc. In any case,
citizen activists are almost always seeking records
of official acts
which there is no good reason not to disclose.
Before
you make your request, study sections 260(7), 300 and 320. 260(7)
and 300 spell out what they can charge for, and 320
requires them to
respond within 5 business days.
Tip
#3: Put your request in writing, and make it as specific as possible.
Hand deliver it if you can, or send it registered
mail, because you don’t
want it to be sucked up by aliens and disappear.
Include this sentence at
the bottom - "Since it is likely that the
requested documents will be
quite numerous, I ask that you locate and compile
the documents without
copying them. Please notify me by telephone and I
will travel to review
them in your office, and at that time I can copy
the ones that seem
relevant." Otherwise an obstructive staff
member will charge you up the
ying-yang to be buried in an avalanche of
irrelevant papers.
In
many agencies, their public disclosure performance sucks. Not only
are their records in disarray, not only does their
staff have an
obstructive attitude, but they are unfamiliar with
the requirements of
RCW 42.17, and they are making up the rules as they
go. They stall, they
charge exorbitant fees, they will even quote some
obscure paragraph out
of their employee manual and try to say it has the
authority of law. If
you persist, they will threaten you,
"explain" to you, "reason" with you,
plead with you, and bump you up the administrative
ladder, where the
threatening, explaining, etc. will start all over
again. Expect this, and
welcome it as a sign that you are causing them some
grief. Politely and
firmly insist on your right to inspect their
records, and your
persistence will pay off. Either they will give you
the documents you’re
after, deny that they exist, or deny your request.
Tip
#4
(a):
They give you the documents. Good! As soon as possible, while
it’s still fresh in your mind, go through what
they gave you and make a
list of additional documents that you want, either
because they’re
mentioned in there or you think they should be.
First thing tomorrow
morning, go in and hit them with another request,
if possible presenting
it to the same staff member who filled the original
one. You have a
window of opportunity here, and you want to
strike while the iron is hot.
(b):
They deny that the document exists. Get this in writing, because you
can use it. If the record truly doesn’t exist,
and you think it should,
stand up in a public meeting of the governing body
and ask why the agency
has been so remiss as not to compile such a crucial
piece of information.
Chances are, though, the record does exist but the
agency is concealing
it by calling it something else or filing it in an
unusual location. RCW
42.17.260 requires them to index all their public
documents (which very
few agencies have done), and you can hammer on this
as a violation that
is obstructive to disclosure. If the agency does
have an index (surprise,
surprise) and it is reasonably complete (no way!),
the world is your
oyster. Get a copy of that sucker and start
requesting things you didn’t
even know they had.
(c):
They deny your request. Cool! Actually, this happens a lot less than
you would expect, mostly because they have to state
the specific
exemption that justifies the denial, and usually
they can’t find it. If
they do state an exemption, look it up. More than
once an agency has
tried to use an exemption that didn’t really
apply, or stretch an
exemption to cover more than it really does. In any
case, study up on
sections 325 and 340, and decide if you’ve
got a basis for legal action.
Understand
how the bureaucratic mind works - they are not quick
thinkers, and they value the predictability of
routine. When faced with a
challenge, they want to bluff and bluster, pass the
buck, hide behind
their legal counsel - anything to avoid debating
the particular topic on
its merits, because that represents a huge risk to
them. Most of the
time, it has been so long since they were taken to
task that it is fairly
easy to put them on the defensive, but it can be
difficult to motivate
them to action. Prepare to spend some time and
effort schooling them up
in the way they should go, and after they find out
you’re serious, they
will not depart from it.
Now
let’s get down to the nuts and bolts of this thing. I have been
researching public disclosure for quite a while,
and I have found some
ways to bypass or overcome most obstructive
behaviors. I haven’t always
been 100% successful on the first try, but I can
eventually get what I’m
after, and usually back down a few obstructers in
the process. While
that’s good for me, it doesn’t help you, or any
other citizen seeking
information, as the obstructers will walk all over
you if they think
you’ll stand for it. Here’s what I’ve been
doing about it in Clallam
county, where we have one good commissioner, one
bad one, and one who
could go either way, depending on how he’s
influenced.
On
the "supply" side, I have enlisted the aid of
the good one, and I am
increasing the pressure on the middle one, to enact
policies that
encourage citizen access and discourage agency
obstruction. Frankly, we
can write off the bad one’s cooperation in this
regard, because he and
his pet department perceive that they have more to
lose than to gain by
public disclosure, and also because he is not
facing reelection for quite
a while. I predict he will continue to give lip
service to the subject,
but won’t lift a finger to accomplish it. When I
testified these
violations into the public record for the first
time, he said, "Well, it
looks like you’ve found some holes in the
system." Dude! You don’t have a
freaking system, and furthermore, you didn’t even
know that one was
required! Fortunately, we don’t need his support
if the other two can be
convinced to act together.
As
far as "demand" is concerned, I want to see a big increase in
the
number of citizens requesting records from county
agencies. This could
make departmental staff quite agreeable to
improving their request
handling procedures, because if they continue their
present inefficient
methods, the sheer volume would bury them (but
then, they’re already
overworked and underpaid, right? Ha, ha). Here are
some more things I’ve
asked my supporters to do, and you may find these
methods useful with
your own pet agencies:
1.
Visit the county website at www.clallam.net,
and ask yourself why the
meeting minutes, departmental organization charts,
and summaries of
pending and recent agency actions are nowhere to be
found. Better yet,
ask your commissioner.
2.
Discuss with your friends, relatives, and neighbors (who are all
registered voters, right?) the benefits of forcing
all county departments
to conduct their business openly and honestly, with
nothing to hide from
the taxpayers.
3.
When you talk to someone who has been screwed by a county department,
ask them if they are mad enough to do something
about it.
4.
Attend a public meeting of a county board or department, and then
obtain the minutes so you can see if they
accurately reflect what
happened there. Write a letter to the editor of
your local paper
describing what you found.
5.
Contact others in your area who are championing conservative causes.
You can compare notes and find out what has and
hasn’t worked for those
who have already done it.
6.
Make up your mind right now that bureaucrats are wrong to oppose the
citizens’ interests,
and we refuse to take it lying down.
Here
are some specific violations of chapter 17, which your agencies
have probably committed. The problem you’ll
likely face is not trapping
them in a violation, but finding so many you
won’t know where to start.
1.
Failure to publish procedures as required by RCW 42.17.250(1).
2.
Failure to list exemption(s) as required by RCW 42.17.260(2).
3.
Failure to publish and maintain a current index as required by RCW
42.17.260(3), or issue a formal order and present
internal indexes as
provided in RCW 42.17.260(4).
4.
Failure to publish and display a statement of fees as required by RCW
42.17.260(7).
5.
Charging fees to the public in excess of those authorized by
subsection 260(7), in violation of the second
sentence of subsection 300
(No fee shall be charged for locating public
documents). This violation
is particularly serious in light of RCW 36.18.160,
which reads in part,"
If any officer takes more or greater fees than are
allowed by law he
shall be subject to prosecution, and on conviction,
shall be removed from
office and fined in a
sum not exceeding one thousand dollars."
In
all fairness, I must admit that in certain departments, although they
fall short of absolute compliance with the letter
of the law, the staff
is quite helpful, and willing to release any public
record documents in
their possession upon request. Needless to say,
with these departments
and their staff I am ordinarily much less
confrontational. Unfortunately,
in other departments, certain staff are not as
forthcoming, and display a
variety of obstructive behaviors to avoid
disclosure. Some of these
behaviors are momentarily successful and some are
not, especially to a
determined citizen activist who knows his rights.
Common
obstructive behaviors (and what you can do about them without
going to court)
denial
of existence - get denial in writing, then locate doc yourself
(requires an inside friend), make them produce
their internal index and
find it in there, find an example of previous
agency use, question how
could the function in question happen without doc (if
no doc, where do
you
derive the authority to perform function), confront the likely
source
or author of the doc and ask what happened to it
(believe it or not, he’s
probably proud of it)
excessive
fees - limiting clause in PD request (something like, "I
believe that the disclosure of the above
information will benefit the
public interest and am therefore asking that you
waive any fees which
arise from the copying of the requested materials.
If copy costs exceed
$5.00 please inform me and I will arrange to
receive the material by fax
or travel to review it in your office." That
way, if they try to run up
fees on you, you can refuse to pay the overage),
insist they itemize
charges, cite s.300. Don’t pay any fees for
research or locating
documents, because s. 260(7) and 300 only allow
them to charge the direct
costs of copying, mailing etc.
have
to consult legal counsel - "okay, but get it in writing, because
that becomes public record too, s.260(3)b,c"
Most counsels (in our case
the deputy prosecutor) would rather have a root
canal without Novocaine
than issue a written opinion about public
disclosure.
excessive
delay - reduce request, cite s.290 "most timely possible
action", s.320 requires them to respond within
5 business days
all
- ask question "do you deny that state PD statutes apply to your
agency? Reply in writing."
Don’t
charge off after all the varmints at once, and don’t be nasty
unless you have to, but concentrate your efforts
where you think they’ll
be most effective. Be assured, there are more and
more people thinking
this way, and if enough of us each take a chip off
our favorite
department, pretty soon they’ll be nothing but a
pile of chips. Help your
friends, hurt your enemies, and don’t move
against somebody until you’ve
got about 10 times the horsepower you think
you’ll need to bury them.
Once you open the gate, don’t stop plowing ‘til
you’re back at the barn.
I
wish I could tell you that success is just a formula thing, that if we
add a and b and c together in the right order, no
public official will
obstruct a citizen ever again. As much as I’d
like to believe it myself,
it’s just not true. There are no guarantees, just
smart and foolish ways
to apply our time and resources. Full disclosure
may not solve every
single problem that our government faces, but it
would certainly be a big
step in the right direction. I’m going after it,
and I hope you will too.
Remember,
it is only what we are entitled to by law.
Speaking
only for himself,
K.
Parker Stoops
"Fighting
crime by prohibiting guns is like trying to
save trees by breaking axe handles."
|