Thoughts
about the 2000 Presidential election
by Bill Stell
Consider...
1. All Al Gore had to do to win the election
was to carry Tennessee, his home
state.
2. It is incorrect to refer to votes that were "not
counted". Some votes were
"discounted", which is to say they were looked at
twice, found invalid
(dimpled) and discarded.
3. The same folks who applauded when the Supreme Court
"found" a
constitutional right to privacy in Roe vs. Wade; and were
pleased when the
Supreme Court of Florida changed the rules (legislated) an
extension to time
limits put in place by the Legislature; these same folks
were then offended
when the U. S. Supreme Court found a violation of equal
protection and due
process rights by a 7-2 vote.
4. Rev. Jesse Jackson, in calling for taking the fight
"into the streets" to
trigger a "civil rights explosion", has disavowed
everything his idol, Martin
Luther King stood for.
5. Al Gore, while calling for the counting of every vote,
brought suit to
have absentee ballots thrown out. The fact that most of
these came from our
sons and daughters serving their country's military presence
abroad is
especially revealing. Secondly, gore's call for a recount
was addressed to
only a few heavily Democratic counties. Had he called for a
statewide
recount, the result might have been different; but when
offered this by the
Florida Supreme Court, his lawyers declined.
6. Al Gore's nationwide plurality was 48.315%. While he won
more votes that
George W. Bush, he (like Clinton in 1992) did not have a
majority.
7. The tremendous strides achieved in race relations in the
past 30 years
have suffered a terrible setback. Why did 90% of the blacks
vote for Gore? We
need to explore that, without resuming affirmative action,
which is based on
the premise that blacks are inferior.
8. The low expectations of our new president Bush can e an
asset. Whatever he
gets done in the way of nonpartisanship will be seen
as an unexpected
victory.
9 On reflection, I am amazed by the 19th century voting
procedures in place
in Florida and (apparently) elsewhere. I voted in Virginia,
using a touch
screen, with which it is impossible to vote for more than
one candidate, so
the chances of a voided vote are nil. Also, the computerized
total is
available immediately, not relying on either a machine or
a people count.