Group Sues to Enforce Sound Science Law
Global Warming Alarmism to Face Trial
by
CEI Staff
Washington, D.C., August 6, 2003— The Competitive Enterprise
Institute today filed suit in federal court against the White House
Office of Science and Technology Policy for refusing to implement
the Federal Data Quality Act in regard to two major global warming
reports. The law, signed by President Clinton, requires that data
disseminated by the government meet basic scientific standards for
“objectivity” and “utility.” It has been ignored in the case of administration
climate reports, despite earlier petitions by CEI.
Under the Data Quality Act, material which is considered “influential
scientific information” – i.e., is likely to influence public policy
or private sector decisions – is also subject to the scrutiny of scientific
validation. The National Assessment on Climate Change (2000) and EPA's
Climate Action Report 2002 base their analyses of the potential impacts
of climate change on two computer models that are incapable of providing
reliable predictions. Efforts to validate these two models actually
exposed them as less capable at predicting climate impacts than a
table of random numbers. The law prohibits taxpayer funding to promote
such speculation or advocacy.
“The agencies producing the Assessment were informed their models
had been proven useless, and in fact they confirmed the test’s results
themselves, but still proceeded to publish a knowingly fictional document.
This establishes that the data fails to meet not only the ‘utility’
but also the ‘objectivity’ standard,” said Christopher C. Horner,
counsel and senior fellow at CEI. These junk science reports are already
being used to support otherwise groundless lawsuits filed by global
warming alarmists and states seeking to hobble those more competitive.
In fact, the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, which
produced one of the models used in the Assessment, acknowledged at
the time it was selected that its model’s data were not useful for
the purpose the administration is using it. Specifically, Hadley stated
this on its website, “In areas where coasts and mountains have significant
effect on weather [and this will be true for most parts of the world],
scenarios based on global models will fail to capture the regional
detail needed for vulnerability assessments at a national level.”
Regardless, this model is used to project specific, but scientifically
unsupportable, U.S. climate impacts, which are incorporated in both
reports.
_________________________________________________________________________
CEI is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group dedicated to
the principles of free enterprise and limited government. For more
information about CEI, please visit our website at www.cei.org.