Spokane: County
endorses transit tax issue despite
objections
Adam
Lynn The Spokane Transit Authority is
a bloated bureaucracy that doesn't deserve one
extra dime of tax money until it cleans up its
act.
That's the message a new
political action committee will be pushing over
the next few weeks as it tries to persuade
Spokane County voters to oppose a proposed
transit tax increase.
The group, called Citizens for
Responsible Transit, kicked off its campaign
Tuesday by asking county commissioners to take
no formal position on Proposition 1, which would
raise the sales tax by three-tenths of 1 percent
throughout the STA service area.
Group member Joel Crosby, a
former Spokane city councilman, told
commissioners the STA's budget should be scoured
for savings before the agency asks taxpayers for
a bailout.
"This, we feel, has some
major flaws in it," Crosby said. "We
want you to go back and really evaluate the
transit system."
The commission voted to endorse
the tax proposal nonetheless.
Money raised by the tax would be
used to replace funding STA lost when the state
Legislature did away with the motor vehicle
excise tax in response to Initiative 695, passed
by voters in 1999.
The agency relied on vehicle tax
money for nearly 40 percent of its annual
budget, or about $14 million per year.
STA leaders say they will have
to dramatically cut services if the tax increase
is not passed Sept. 17.
Members of Citizens for
Responsible Transit said Tuesday that STA has
shown itself incapable of running an efficient
operation.
Many buses travel with only a
few passengers on board, and the downtown bus
Plaza is a symbol of excess, said Dave Hamer,
longtime Spokane clothier and member of the
anti-transit tax group.
"The transit system
shouldn't be a giant cab company," Hamer
said.
Dave Levitch, who worked for the
local bus service when it was still run by the
city, also is a member of Citizens for
Responsible Transit.
Levitch told commissioners that
STA management hasn't done enough to cut costs,
look for efficiencies or raise revenue from
other sources.
He suggested cutting the subsidy
for disabled riders as one way of raising cash.
"Just because someone's
disabled doesn't mean they don't have any
money," Levitch said.
Crosby said the group was
particularly upset that the proposed tax
increase has no expiration date. "This is
like a blank check," he said.
In addition, there should be
higher priorities in the community than funding
transit, Crosby said, like paying for street
repairs.
Commissioners John Roskelley and
Kate McCaslin, both of whom sit on the STA board
of directors, were unmoved.
Roskelley said the STA board has
taken a hard look at the agency's budget in the
last few years, cutting service by 20 percent
and raising fares.
McCaslin agreed and pointed out
that the agency has no other places to turn for
money. Plus, many poor people have no choice but
to use public transportation, she said.
"Am I thrilled with this
proposal? No, I'm not," McCaslin said.
"But at the end of the day, I'm going to
support it. For those who are most vulnerable in
our society, this is their only means of getting
from anywhere to anywhere."
She and Roskelley then voted to
endorse Proposition 1, which also has the
backing of the Spokane City Council and a
political action committee called Citizens for
Public Transportation.
County Commissioner Phil Harris
abstained from Tuesday's vote. Harris has argued
that commissioners shouldn't take sides in
elections, a stance normally supported by
McCaslin.
"Sometimes, there are
compelling reasons when we have to speak
up," she said Tuesday.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]
|