Numbers
to Make Your Head Spin- Government spending
is out of control
by
Danielle I. Doans,
Citizens
for a Sound Economy
August
28, 2002
In “The Road Not Taken” poet Robert
Frost ponders at a fork in the road and
whether or not to choose ’the one less
traveled.’ It has always been assumed that
this ‘less traveled’ road was the choice
for innovators and leaders - for who else
would have the temerity to take the road
less traveled with all of its pitfalls and
potential dangers? Congress now finds itself
at a fork in the road. Will they take the
more traveled road of more spending and
bigger government? Or will they take the
less traveled road of fiscal discipline?
As indicated in the title of this week’s Novak
column, a budget showdown is in the works.
Congress has been spending money without any
substantiation of need or even regard to the
consequences. When Republicans took over
Congress it was with all of the fiscal
fervor of the newly converted. Budgets were
slashed and Departments were eliminated - at
least in several legislative proposals.
Agencies were going to have to fight for
every dime and justify their needs to the
American public that funded them. And then
something funny happened. Republicans
realized that money helps elections. If you
provide federal funding for say veterans -
then the veterans like you and say nice
things about you and maybe even vote for
you. If there are farmers in your district
why not vote for a bill that provides them
with some subsidies? So what if only
$200,000 out of $78 BILLION actually gets to
them - that still buys goodwill right? Plus
we had a surplus, we can afford to give
money to our friends - it’s FREE!
What Republicans failed to realize is that
1) these groups (all of these groups that
feed at the public trough) will never, ever
in this lifetime have enough money and will
always come back for more and 2) once you
begin a cycle of higher spending this cycle
has to be maintained.
What does this mean in practical terms?
Let’s take a look:
-
Since 1996 the
Department of Education - originally the
scourge of Republican purists now the
darling of the party, has increased by
over 130%! Is this because the
Department suddenly became effective and
really started helping children learn?
-
Since a low of $501
Billion in 1996 the overall level of
discretionary spending has increased to
$737 Billion in 2002. Since 1998 (when
surpluses immerged) the level of
spending increased by an average 7.4% a
year!
-
If the President\'s
request level were inacted total Labor-HHS
spending would increase by $20.7 billion
or 18.8 percent since the last election.
The increase for the entire bill since
Republicans took control of Congress in
1995 is 94 percent compared with 47
percent for defense.
Now to the fork in the road. President
Bush, after getting a shaky start by
signing the egregious farm bill and
creating steel quotas has taken two
solid steps to enforcing fiscal
discipline. First, he kept Congress from
engaging in an all out spending spree on
the supplemental spending bill. Then he
decided not to allow the extra $5
billion in add-ons that they provided
despite his admonitions. Both of these
positive steps have put the onus for
fiscal discipline squarely on the
shoulders of Congressional members.
Every year Congress plays the same
appropriations game - it passes the
smaller bills by taking money from the
ever popular Labor, HHS and Education (LHE)
appropriations bill and then, in a last
minute get-out-the-door spending spree,
throws the money back in thereby
increasing the overall pot. Fiscal
conservatives in the House decided this
year not to play that game and demanded
that House bring up LHE as one of the
first bills. So upon returning from
their August recess House leadership is
expected to bring up the LHE bill. The
problem is that many of the big spenders
don’t support the President’s
request and House passed budget level
for LHE of $130 billion. This despite
the fact that $130 billion represents an
increase of $6.6 billion from last year.
For many of these big spenders it is not
enough to double the Dept. of Health and
Human Services in five years. We can
only hope that those Members concerned
with out-of-control spending outnumber
the big spenders caucus.
Besides the implications for this
individual bill, the vote itself
represents an important symbol of the
overall commitment to fiscal discipline.
If Members of Congress cannot vote for a
bill that is funded at the President’s
request level and consistent with the
amount they approved earlier this year,
then you can throw any other attempts of
fiscal sanity out the window. The
question that Members needs to ask
themselves is, “when is enough,
enough?”
When members reach that fork I hope they
will choose the one less traveled and
fight for fiscal restraint - the
taxpayers could use a break!
With fiscal deficits looming, a War on
Terror continuing and the economy
staggering American can no longer afford
the luxury of a government that spends
our money like drunken sailors. The big
spenders in Congress would like you to
believe that our current fiscal decline
is due to the Bush tax cut and September
11th ignoring of course the obvious
effect of runaway spending. The high
times are over for the both the federal
and state governments and it is time
they learned this lesson and get back to
acting judiciously with the federal
purse. This fall when members reach the
important fork I hope they will choose
the one less traveled and fight for
fiscal restraint - the taxpayers need a
break!
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any
copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair
use without profit or payment for non-profit research and
educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]
|