Home Rule Charter Commission
prepares to determine which portions of the Charter will be sent to the
ballot for change by Sue Forde for Citizen
Review Online Port Angeles, WA – 4/11/02 –
Approximately 10 citizens showed up for the Clallam County Home Rule
Charter Commission meeting at 6:30.
During the public hearing section, which started the meeting,
several people spoke to the commission about their experiences with the
Department of Community Development (DCD), and requested that the
Commission place the proposition on the ballot that the Director of that
department become an elected position.
Strong comments were also made by local citizens to strengthen
the initiative process. K. Parker Stoops was representative of
the citizens’ comments. He
told the commissioners that “99;9% of the land owners are not killing
wildlife, and are willing to comply, provided it’s [the law] uniformly
administered.” He stated
that the current director of DCD [Bob Martin] “has not been
characterized by any of those”, and stated that the county
commissioners are not doing their job regarding the abuses of both,
including the department’s personnel.
“I ask you to allow the voters to do that job,” he urged the
commissioners. Sheriff Joe Hawe was the invited
speaker to the Commission; he reviewed the needs of his department and
made several suggestions as to how changes in the Charter could improve
it. He stated that the
primary responsibility of local government is the protection of the
citizens. He spoke about
the lack of funding in the criminal justice systems.
He also spoke about the coroner’s position, which has been an
issue of debate. {Clallam County does not have a formal county coroner.)
He said he isn’t happy with the current system, “but it
works.” He explained that
law enforcement officers act as deputy coroners.
They are trained to deal with the family, and to protect the
assets of the deceased, he explained.
“We don’t need another bureaucracy,” he asserted. The Charter Review Commission then
went to work, reviewing the Charter section by section to determine
which items should go to committee for further discussion.
Following are the items which will be forwarded to committees for
discussion to determine which, if any, will proceed to the ballot for
the peoples’ vote: Preamble – The county’s main
function to be protection of the people. Section 2:2 – Commissioners should
be elected by district rather than at large – increasing the number of
commissioners. Section 3.2 – Emergency ordinances. Section 3.3 – Ordinances
incorporating other laws by reference. Article 4 – Other elected officials Article 5 – Administrative
departments – should be delineated as far as DCD is concerned. Article 5.25 – Hearing examiner
system – broaden duties. Article 5.30 – Resolutions &
motions – administrator appointed or removed by ordinance or
resolution (for housekeeping purposes) Article 5.4 – Administrator
– elected versus appointed. Article 6.2 – Duties and
responsibilities of Administrator for basic housekeeping purposes.
Any evaluation of department heads?
Who supervises? Article 7.1 – 7.3 - Elections Article 7.4 – District boundaries
for county commissioner – changing dates to correspond with the state.
Order of importance for the items – balance population or
north-south boundaries more important?
Move to August date for completion – allows all data to be
available. Resources
mandated to Districting Master – 5% of what?? Article 7.5 – Vacancies – does not
deal with nonpartisan candidates. Nothing
about replacing district court judges, should they leave.
RCW different than charter. Article 7.6 – Initiative &
Referendum – strengthen it and make it better rather than taking it
away. When a legal review
should take place. Section 8.20 – Initiative &
Referendum – separate them? Sections 8.3 thru 8.7 – Initiative
& Referendums – limitations and more. Article 9.1 thru 9.4 – questions
raised by Administrator about budgeting process – shortfalls that need
to be handled – substantial change from proposed to final budget. Article 9.5 – Contracts –
housekeeping issue. Articles 10.1, 10.2, 10.4 –
Personnel – county career service – what is it?
Need to fix some issues. Public
hearing to dismiss an employee – should this change to take place
before a hearing examiner instead? Article 12.2 – Purchasing contracts
and bonds. Article 12.4 – Claims against the
county. New Sections Proposed Rod Fleck:
County shall maintain two district courts – one in Port Angeles
and one in Forks. Impacts
on Sheriff’s department because of transport issue. Don Alexander:
Any ordinance or resolution shall provide a funding source. Primary duty of the county government
is to protect the people. Committee assignment will handed out before the next meeting. The next meeting will take place on April 25, 2002 at the Clallam County Courthouse starting at 6:30 p.m.
|
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml] |