Open Letter to WA State Representatives about wilderness areas
TO THE ELECTED 24TH DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVES
Do you EVER look down on “We the People”?
Do you EVER see our economic suffering?
Do you ever respond to our emails?
Is this the FUTURE “YOU” have planned for my 16 Grandchildren?
YOU legislate, YOU appoint, YOU disappoint, AND, “We the people” suffer the consequences of what YOU have done.
WHO IS REALLY RUNNING “WILD” IN AMERICA? SPECIAL INTEREST, NON-PROFIT, non-taxpaying Special Interest Coalitions and groups.
About The Wild Olympics Campaign
Olympic Park Associates
Olympic Forest Coalition
Olympic Peninsula Audubon Society
North Olympic Group — Sierra Club
Campaign for America’s Wilderness, Pew Environment Group
Since when? Do our elected officials and We the American people JUST SIT BACK and ALLOW SPECIAL INTEREST, NON-PROFIT, non-taxpaying Special Interest Coalitions and groups TO RUN WILD IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?
THE TRUTH ABOUT “WILD”
EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN ( over 300 million) IS DEPRIVED IN EVERY WILD NATIONAL PARK AND ON EVERY WILD AND SCENIC RIVER.
WILD OLYMPICS vs OVER 300 MILLION AMERICAN CITIZENS DEPRIVED OF THE FULL USE AND ENJOYMENT OF OVER ONE MILLION ACRES OF PUBLIC LAND IN JUST THE OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK .
POPULATION OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Source: U.S. Census Bureau 311,591,917 Three hundred eleven million, five hundred ninety one thousand, nine hundred and seventeen
What was the intent of Congress with regard to the full use and enjoyment of the public land, in the creation of Olympic National Park, by the American People that own that public land?
Due process of law when just a single citizen is deprived?
What happens when over 300 million American Citizens are deprived of the full use and enjoyment of every WILD National Park public land?
Pearl Rains Hewett
Citizen, North Olympic Peninsula
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]