"Volunteers" monitor streams after receiving "training" from environmental agencies

Dedicated senior citizens keep watch over Pennsylvania waterways

 

from Environmental News Network

 

HARRISBURG, Penn.12/28/01 — They wade into cold streams with color-wheel gauges to test phosphate, nitrate, and sulfate levels. They scoop sediment from stream beds, noting its color and smell.

Citizen scientists, as they call themselves, are volunteers who keep watch over Pennsylvania's waterways. They are men like Jim Haney, a 67-year-old retired environmental engineer from New Cumberland, and Bud Bankert, a 73-year-old retired biology teacher.

About 1,000 seniors have enlisted in Pennsylvania's Senior Environment Corps, a volunteer program launched in 1997 through an agreement between the state departments of aging and environmental protection and a Virginia-based nonprofit organization. And the number of volunteers has grown steadily.

Monitoring work is performed by 21 corps groups covering 42 of the state's 67 counties. Their gauges measure conductivity, alkalinity, and acidity.

The data are entered into an Internet database for use by state environmental officials and members of watershed associations or county conservation districts — or anyone else interested in the health of their local streams or creeks.

In the spring and fall, the volunteers conduct macroinvertebrate inventories, using nets to catch aquatic bugs. They also examine stream banks for erosion, and if they find anything unusual, report it immediately to the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).

Haney is out once a week in all types of weather sampling streams. The work is wet and dirty. "It's not just going out and picking a nice shady spot by a stream," Haney said. "We know a certain spot is important to DEP. Maybe there's a pipe upstream and there's effluent that they're concerned about."

The volunteer bug bit Bankert three years ago when he saw an advertisement in a York newspaper seeking senior citizens to participate in a water-quality monitoring project. Bankert called his fishing buddy Ernie Lauer, a retired Harley-Davidson engineer. Ever since, the men have been dedicated members of the group.

"We decided it would be a good thing to be involved with, mainly because most people don't realize how critical the water situation is becoming," said Bankert. "The only way we can ensure we have good water in the future is to keep monitoring it."

The volunteer program has become a model for similar efforts in about 15 other states, including California, Oklahoma, and New Hampshire, said Tom Benjamin, president of the Environmental Alliance for Senior Involvement, the nonprofit group that administers the programs.

The program is funded with about $300,000 in state grants, combined with federal and private grants. State officials say it illustrates how teamwork between citizens and government can benefit the environment. Most of the money is used to train volunteers and provide them with test kits and other light equipment needed to do their sampling.

"We instill in the volunteers that there's a real need for them to be out there," said Haney, a corps leader since the program's inception. "They're out there to make sure the stream is staying clean."

In Cumberland County, volunteers once found that the stream they had gone to check had disappeared — into a sinkhole caused by construction. They alerted environmental officials and the problem was corrected.

In Philadelphia, a corps group working on a bacterial monitoring project in the Wissahickon Creek is helping to determine whether the water is safe for swimming. "It's a huge database of information that we wouldn't have otherwise," said Diane Wilson, coordinator of DEP's volunteer monitoring programs. "These people are on reaches of streams where nobody else goes."

David Hess, secretary of DEP, regards the corps as a kind of health insurance policy for state waterways. "Having 1,000 extra pairs of eyes is invaluable," he said.

"There are 83,000 miles of waterways in Pennsylvania, and are we hitting them all? No," said Beth Grove of the Environmental Alliance. "But we're making one heck of a dent in them."


Commentary by Jackie Patru: - The DEP is enlisting uninformed and sincere senior citizens to be their 'eyes' for monitoring the streams in Pennsylvania.  It would be well to remember that the pollution problem was created a long time ago... state and local governments purposely allowing gross pollution by industry pouring their crud directly into streams and rivers for decades. 

Then, when the problem is so big everyone cries out for 'solutions', the SOLUTION is the federal Environmental Protection Agency, mirrored in the states by legislature- created agencies - State Departments of Environmental Protection - which agents are granted powers to promulgate rules and regulations that are assumed as "force of law".  Bureaucrats running the show. When you have a problem with a bureaucrat, there is no help available, because the legislative officials' hands are tied by their own doing.

Today, the bureaucrats in the DEP tell us that "point source pollution" (pouring the crud directly into the streams and rivers by industry) was once a problem, and that one is solved.  NOW, they realize the real problem in Non-point Source Pollution... the source of which are the few farmers and ranchers surviving.  

It is true that the same legislative power that created the state agencies could undo the damage.  However, that never seems to happen, does it?

Pennsylvania state Rep. Matt Baker, who appears to be on a tight leash to local influential lawyer, Bill Hebe (Hebe is campaign manager for Baker and Tioga Co. Commissioner Charles James who both go the party line like good little sheep) was candid enough to admit (back in '95) that many state legislators realize they have  legislated away too much of their authority and have had no luck getting proposed bills that would disempower the agencies out of committee. 

"Gosh, golly, gee whiz... we're really sorry".  They really will be when they realize how their actions will destroy their own lives and the lives of their loved ones - if they have any. 

In case you haven't seen this excellent piece on who really owns the environmentalist movement, I'm pasting it here for your convenience, and the article follows.  - Jackie     

Who Owns the Environmentalist Movement?
"…It is clear that those at the top of the environmentalist movement are witting in their advocacy of policies that ultimately kill people. We know this is the case because many of the environmentalist policy-makers say so publicly. … The fact is that the top ozone depletion propagandists at the World Wildlife Fund, the Club of Rome, the Population Crisis Committee/Draper Fund, and other elite bodies want it to kill people."

Jackie Patru is the editor of "Sweet Liberty", http://www.sweetliberty.org/ and lives Pennsylvania.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]

Back to Current Edition Citizen Review Archive LINKS Search This Site