Stevens County activist stands for individuals rights on private property, water, and runs for office
Posted 6/9/2010
Stevens County, WA - Rene' Holaday is a concerned citizen who has educated herself and has been actively working against several issues in the last four years that have served to threaten our private property rights, and water rights, and has written a bill to the state legislature to protect individuals' rights as far as their private property and water is concerned (see below for text of the bill).
Holaday reports that she has spent thousands of hours over the past 4 years researching NAIS, Real ID, the United Nations, "The UN's Sustainable Development Agenda 21", global economics, the Yukon to Yellowstone Bill, Cap and Trade, and infringement of our property and water rights. "I was a (volunteer) primary researcher for a website called StopAnimal ID.org, where I contributed over 720 articles and govt documents," she says.
Over the past 4 years, Holaday says she has organized 5 protests against NAIS (National Animal Identification System, now re-named Animal Disease Traceability-ADT), and organized thousands of people into action to work against NAIS. She states that she has given many public information presentations on all of these subjects each year to bring awareness of these issues to the people. "I was also one of the key people who helped to introduce 2 different 'No NAIS' Bills into the State Legislature, even though our legislature failed to pass these bills," she says.
"I have given testimony against the implementation of Sustainable Development in Spokane on 2 different occasions, and I have an active email list that reaches all around the nation that I use to keep people informed," Holladay asserts.
She said she organized a mass public signing of Memorandums of Opposition to the "Yukon to Yellowstone Bill"(Y2Y) that has been introduced. "I had other volunteers assist me in this endeavor, and it was a great turnout of people who kept the signings going on throughout the entire community," she states on her website.
She decided to run as a Republican Candidate for the position of County Commissioner, Pos. #2 in her county. On her campaign website, Holaday says she has spent nearly 6 years in college for Engineering, Wildlife Biology, and Sociology. In her last 2 years for Sociology, her two areas of focus for research were the Holocaust, and the false science of Eugenics, she states.
She is currently self-employed, following her lifelong passion of being a horse trainer and breeder of Appaloosa Sport Horses. "My breeding program is now one of the top 3 in the nation," she says. She and her husband have one son and own and live on their 40 acre working horse farm in Chewelah, WA.
Holaday also hosts the website for the idea of splitting WA State into its own state called East WA. The web address for that site is www.EastWA51stState.com "I don't approve of the entire eastern half of WA State having little to no representation in the Legislature, Senate, or from the Governor," she says. "I absolutely support a civil division of the state into two separate states that can occur with agreement in the State Legislature and a vote of approval from Congress. Right now we are accepting volunteers for petition gathering in each county that would become "East WA". I feel this is a "common sense", viable solution to our utter lack of representation at the state level," she states on her website.
Holday continues: "The Dept. of Ecology has stated that they have been able to get more done in this area in the past 5 years than they have been able to get done in the last 35 years. I believe this is because our leaders have been all too willing to compromise on our property rights and water rights. I have been fighting these issues for 4 years and I plan to continue that fight when I get into office. Its time Stevens County had somebody that will stand up for the people on these issues and protect the people's private property and water rights."
Following is the proposed bill written by Holaday:
ENGROSSED COMBINED SENATE/HOUSE BILL
______________________________________________________
State of Washington 2010 Regular Session
By Rene’ Holaday, Rep. Candidate for Stevens County
Commissioner, Pos. #2
An Act to establish new laws to protect the people of Washington
State from all agencies, both state and federal, that wish to infringe
upon the people’s private property rights, and water rights. As it
stands, there are currently no oversight laws that have been
established that serve to protect the private property rights and
water rights of the people of the State of Washington from the out
of control state and/or federal agency regulations. Considering that
a man-made global warming scenario has never been unanimously
proven and supported by the global scientific population, all
environmental preservation precedence over people’s private
property rights and water rights must be considered null and void.
This Bill addresses new laws to protect the people from a
fraudulent agenda that has been in practice over the past decade.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Washington:
NEW CHAPTER 1
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. No state or federal agency may employ
any action of land use regulation against a private property owner
in the attempt to regulate the landowner’s usage of his privately
owned property, unless;
1.) It is established through a court of law and jury trial, which
reaches a unanimous verdict of guilt against the landowner, in
which the land owner has caused undeniable bodily harm to
another person, or another person’s privately owned
animals/livestock which were directly caused by actions/practices
used on his private property.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. No state or federal agency may employ
any action of water use regulation against a private property owner
in the attempt to regulate the landowner’s usage of water from any
type of hand dug or drilled well, permitted or non-permitted,
located within the landowner’s private property boundary lines,
unless;
1.) It is established through a court of law and jury trial that
reaches a unanimous verdict of guilt against the landowner, in
which the land owner has caused undeniable, temporary or
permanent absence of water to any other landowner as a provable
direct result of his actions taken on his own land, with the water
which came from his privately owned wells, of which were located
within the property boundary lines of his land.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. No state or federal agency may employ
any action of water use regulation against a private property owner
in the attempt to regulate the landowner’s usage of water from any
naturally occurring springs, ponds, lakes, wetlands, sub-irrigated
lands that originate within the landowner’s private property
boundary lines, unless;
1.) It is established through a court of law and jury trial that
reaches a unanimous verdict of guilt against the landowner, in
which the land owner has caused undeniable, temporary or
permanent absence of water to any other landowner as a provable
direct result of his actions taken on his own land, with the water
which came from his privately owned wells, that were located
within the property boundary lines of his land.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. No state or federal agency may employ
any action of water use regulation against a private property owner
in the attempt to regulate the landowner’s usage of water from any
body of water passing through the landowner’s private property
boundary lines, unless;
1.) The landowner plans to use more than 5,000 gallons of water
per day from that body of water for purposes associated with
agricultural, mining, logging or other commercial usage.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. No state or federal agency may levy
fines against any private property owner for any reason, unless;
1.) It is established through a court of law and jury trial that
reaches a unanimous verdict of guilt against the landowner for
violation against regulations associated with the water usage
permits associated with the landowners who use more than 5,000
gallons per day.
NEW SECTION. Sec.6. No state or federal agency may employ
any action of water use regulation against a private property
owner, in the attempt to regulate the landowner’s usage of water
from rain, snow, hail, or condensation that falls upon the land
within the private property boundary lines, unless;
1.) It is established through a court of law and jury trial that
reaches a unanimous verdict of guilt against the landowner in
which the land owner has used this water/precipitation that fell
from the sky, to cause undeniable bodily harm to another person
or their privately owned animals/livestock.
----END----